Quitting your day job to write full-time is a huge achievement. But what happens when you walk away from a salary? How do you survive your first year? Alliance of Independent Authors blog manager, Sacha Black is approaching her one year anniversary and is here to share both the lessons she learned in her first year of full-time writing as well as the lessons some of our members learned. Learn how to survive your first year as a full-time author.
Before you react to a disappointing review, consider who sent it – “the peanut gallery” or your peers? ALLi’s Creative Advisor Mark McGuinness offers valuable advice on how self-published authors can remain resilient in the face of adverse criticism.
Leonard Cohen is not your typical rock star. Not only does he write slow, melancholic, poetic songs, with a minimalist acoustic accompaniment, he has also spent several years living the reclusive life of a Zen monk, a disciple of the teacher Kyozan Joshu Sasaki Roshi.
In an interview, Cohen told the story of being visited by Roshi at the recording studio during the seventies. The music press critics were writing him off as ‘an old depressive drone peddling suicide notes.’ When the singer asked his teacher what he thought of the music, Roshi replied: “Leonard, you should sing more sad.”
While the critics wanted him to tone it down and deliver something more upbeat, Roshi evidently felt Cohen needed to go in the opposite direction—to stop holding back, forget about people’s expectations, and fully surrender himself to the sadness.
If Cohen had listened to the critics he would have compromised his art and disappointed his fans. No, his work isn’t to everyone’s taste, but trying to please everyone is a recipe for disaster for an artist. Or for anyone else who wants to do something truly original. No wonder Cohen said this was the best advice he ever received.
Consider the Critic
You’re better off doing nothing than doing something bland. Sometimes it’s important—even fun! —to annoy certain people, and have them hate your work. A nice side effect of this kind of criticism is that your fans will love you all the more, and rush to your defense when they see you being attacked.
When you’re faced with criticism, it’s easy to take it at face value. But as Leonard Cohen’s story shows us, who is talking is at least as important as what they are saying.
You might not take kindly to an armchair tennis player giving you advice about your backhand, but if the same words came out of the mouth of a grand slam champion, you’d be all ears, however brutal their assessment.
So before deciding what to do about a piece of criticism, always consider where it’s coming from. Here are some of the usual sources:
- Haters and trolls These people get a kick out of making nasty, offensive, and abusive comments. Many of them don’t have the guts to criticize you to your face, so they are particularly common on the internet, where they are known as trolls. They are a tiny minority, but a vocal one. It’s generally best to ignore them. I’ve occasionally received an embarrassed apology when I’ve replied to an abusive comment or email, but most of them aren’t interested in dialogue. If it helps, look on it as a positive sign that you’re attracting enough attention for the haters to notice you and get annoyed. Trying to avoid upsetting anyone is a recipe for mediocrity.
- The peanut gallery This is the term my friend Sonia Simone uses for all the people who have an opinion on your work, but who are irrelevant to your goals. They include the nit-pickers and ‘yes-butters’ who will always find a flaw in your argument, and the well-intentioned nice people who keep asking you to do something different, even though you’re not remotely interested in doing it.You can safely ignore these people too. Be polite, and make a brief reply if you want to, but don’t take them too seriously. And don’t get sidetracked into playing their game.
- The public I’m not a fan of Henry James’s novels, but even I had to feel sorry for him when I heard that story about him being booed off stage by the public at the premiere of one of his plays. There’s no humiliation like a public humiliation. How seriously you take the public’s opinion will depend on what business you’re in. If you’re the editor of a national newspaper, or commissioning a piece of public art, you will probably pay more attention to it than if you’re an avant-garde novelist, or a creator of fine art that only the richest of the rich can afford. If you’re in a punk band, it would be downright embarrassing to discover everybody and their grandmother tapping their feet and singing along to your songs. As an independent author, you may well be less concerned with broadsheet reviewers and literary critics, than the people who buy your books. So forget ‘the public’ and decide who your public is. Once you know who they are, then you can start worrying about what they think of you.
- The professional critics These are the people whose job it is to critique the work and careers of performers in their field. Traditionally they have been newspaper reviewers, literary critics, academics, and TV or radio pundits. These days they are just as likely to be bloggers and social media power users.There are basically two kinds of professional critic: the ones who ‘get’ what you’re trying to do; and the ones who don’t. Pay more attention to the former than the latter. And the sharper your own critical thinking skills, the more confident you will be in assessing the judgment of professional critics. But don’t be too quick to criticize the critics. Sometimes they tell us just what we need to hear, even if we don’t want to hear it.
- Your peers The obvious thing to watch out for here is rivalry. Are they delivering constructive criticism, or trying to take you down a peg or two? Often it’s a bit of both. And maybe that’s no bad thing—creative tensions have been at the heart of many artistic partnerships and friendships (Wordsworth and Coleridge, Kahlo and Rivera, Lennon and McCartney). And remember, there is one thing your peers can offer you that no one else can—the perspective of someone in a situation very similar to yours.
- Your mentor(s) A mentor is an experienced pro who shares what he or she has learned. Roshi, Yoda, and Mr Miyagi are classic mentors. If you’re lucky enough to have a mentor who knows you well enough to make an informed judgment about your work, and who cares enough to tell you where you need to improve, then you owe it to them—and to yourself—to listen. Tennis player Andy Murray had been teetering on the brink of major tournament success for years, but it was not until he hired veteran champion Ivan Lendl as his coach that he won the Olympic Gold Medal and US Open in quick succession. Murray had the talent and stamina to get within touching distance of a major trophy—but he credited his mentor with helping him reach out and seize it. Mentors are not infallible, and sometimes you reach the point where you’ve outgrown them. But it often pays to give them the benefit of the doubt, and consider their criticisms carefully instead of dismissing them. (Just ask Darth Vader.)
Your Next Steps
Next time you encounter criticism, ask yourself who is speaking:
• Haters and trolls—ignore them. Or report them (to their ISP or the police) if the abuse is seriously threatening.
• The peanut gallery—ignore them. Or be polite but don’t take them seriously.
• The public—firstly, separate the general public from your public (your fans and/or potential customers). Ignore the former; listen to the latter, even if you don’t always do what they want.
• Professional critics—firstly, separate the ones who ‘get’ what you are trying to do from the ones who don’t. Feel free to ignore the latter. Analyze the former’s words carefully, to see whether there’s anything you can learn from them.
• Your peers—firstly, try to distinguish between rivalry and genuine criticism. Secondly, ask yourself whether they have a point, and what you can learn from them.
• Your mentor(s) —listen carefully to what they say and consider it over time. If it’s not clear, ask them to explain further. When in doubt, give them the benefit of the doubt.