After an open and assessed conversation with our members, advisors and other interested parties, the Alliance of Independent Authors developed some ethical and practical guidelines to AI for authors. Particular thanks to Joanna Penn, ALLi's Enterprise advisor, for her contribution and ALLi's Campaign Manager Matty Dalrymple.
The job of the independent author is to write great words, publish great books, and bring those books to the readers who will value them most. AI provides tools that are useful in this work but also raises many practical, ethical and creative questions.
The mission of the Alliance of Independent Authors is to foster ethics and excellence in self-publishing, and these guideposts inform our internal policies and external recommendations related to artificial intelligence. We provide this document to inform our own ALLi Team, our Advisors, our Organization and Partner Members, our Ambassadors, and our Members, and we share it publicly for reference and use by authors everywhere.
AI can potentially impact every area of an indie author’s work, and ALLi wants to provide authors with the information and resources to enable them to make informed decisions for their own writing and publishing work.
To inform our policies and advice, we tap into some of the industry’s acknowledged experts on AI in publishing: ALLi Advisors Jane Friedman and Joanna Penn; ALLi news correspondent Dan Holloway and author of The AI Revolution in Publishing Thad McElroy. ALLi's Watchdog Desk investigates AI tools and recommends those which we consider ethical and most useful to authors. And we seek additional input when required to ensure our understanding of AI is accurate and up to date.
For more on the latest ALLi news, click here.
You can also tune into Dan Holloway’s weekly ALLi podcast episode for info on AI as well as all the latest news.
For more on AI tools and tech, click here.
What is “AI” (and What is It Not)?
The ALLi glossary uses the following definitions related to “AI”:
- Artificial intelligence is technology that replicates human behaviors and abilities conventionally seen as “intelligent.”
- Augmented intelligence is applications or tools that combine human and machine intelligence.
This article addresses both of these forms of AI.
This article does not address more basic forms of machine “intelligence,” such as word processing spell checkers or grammar checkers. It also does not include tools using “narrow AI,” where computers provide support based on specific expertise in a particular area: advertising algorithms, reader analysis and engagement, search and sales engines, and speech-to-text.
AI Tools for Human Creators
ALLi supports the use of AI as a tool for ethical creators, not as a creator itself. AI mimics intelligence and creativity by drawing on a vast pool of human-created content. It can create based on past creations, but if cut off from those sources, its output would degrade; if we were given AI tools trained only on Victorian inputs, we would be shocked and disappointed at the results. AI can learn from mistakes but only where a human indicates that an output is not satisfactory. AI has also been repeatedly shown to be susceptible to biases and to making up information when it does not have the right data to hand.
The job of the independent author is to write great words, publish great books, and reach those readers who will value them most. AI provides tools that are useful in this work but also raises many practical, ethical, and creative questions. We recognize that AI is a complex and divisive issue and know that legal and ethical guidelines will be in flux for years to come. Our role in this continuing evolution is to provide education to indie authors related to AI and to lobby for the rights of indie authors in others’ use of AI.
We believe that actions undertaken by organizations can be more effective than actions undertaken by individuals, and we encourage authors to engage with ALLi on topics related to AI, either as an ALLi member or via our resources at SelfPublishingAdvice.org <https://selfpublishingadvice.org/>, which are available to all authors.
The answers to how AI will impact authors range from apocalyptic to utopian, and as with most new technological breakthroughs, the reality will likely fall between these extremes. ALLi's policy is to encourage the best options, campaign against the worst, and support our author members in making informed decisions.
We frame our position on AI around four pillars: clarity, consent, compensation, and curiosity.
Clarity
ALLi is lobbying for greater clarity and transparency from technology companies about how their AI models are trained and encouraging clarity and transparency from authors. Organizations developing AI tools should be required to maintain a log of what material has been used, accessible on request or made publicly available. Links to source data enable users to assess the relevance and reliability of those sources or to double check the AI’s output. Such links also acknowledge the contributions of the creators of the source material.
Individuals or organizations who use AI for decision-making should divulge this use. Such situations might arise for authors in the context of an AI assessing quality of work for awards, eligibility for economic benefits from grants, or an individual’s qualification for appointment to a role. In addition, creators must have a simple way to request a human review within a reasonable timeframe.
Creators also have a responsibility to provide clarity about their use of AI, for example, in a note on the copyright page.
Consent
A clear process is needed for obtaining consent from creators for use of their material. No AI tool built using copyrighted material without consent can be considered fully ethical, and copyright law is the standard against which we judge the ethics of each AI’s data-gathering process.
ALLi’s Copyright Bill of Rights outlines authors' rights and responsibilities under copyright law, and we have incorporated information on AI into this guide. (Also see our podcast about the Bill of Rights.) In fact, much of the data upon which AI tools are trained allegedly comes from pirate sites of the kind already flagged by ALLi as unethical.
Publishers should include clauses related to AI in all contracts, specifically requiring active consent for an author's works to be used in training AI. Contracts should also require content to use AI tools to create derivative work from an author’s IP–for example, translations or narration.
Users should be able to opt out of having their work used to train AI tools. This is especially vital for authors, since there are many uses of AI that would require an author to input works in progress, synopses, plot ideas, blurbs, etc. AI platform agreements should also include a commitment to the confidentiality of such data.
Clarity is also needed in the laws and guidelines related to content. For example, if an author unintentionally infringes on another author’s copyright by using output from an AI and not checking its sources, who is responsible for that infringement–the author or the AI? Providing clarity around such situations will protect indie authors from unintended violations.
Compensation
The theoretical protections of copyright, which can only be held by humans, are frequently being violated by the companies developing AI tools, who have offered no licensing payment for the use of the material used to train the AI. But how might compensation work, especially across the huge number of impacted creators?
The voluntary license model that is already used for secondary uses / rights and the fees that are collected and distributed to authors by existing Collective Management Organizations (CMOs) such as the UK’s ALCS or the US’s ASCAP could provide a model. Models also need to reflect that once data is ingested into an AI system, it will be used repeatedly.
When a compensation system is established, it should handle both payments from that point onward as well as a one-time retrospective payment for past use. (Since data cannot be removed from an AI tool, consent cannot be withdrawn for data already included in the database.)
Solutions addressing issues related to both consent and compensation must be implementable across borders; otherwise creators risk falling through the net of IP protections. ALLi campaigns for and supports legal decisions that are not specific to one country and that smoothly link into laws and policies internationally.
Curiosity
Keeping in mind the challenges and issues described above, ALLi recommends that authors bring a spirit of curiosity to their consideration of AI, and be willing to explore the potential of AI in their work as writers and publishers.
AI tools can open opportunities for both authors and readers; for example:
- AI can help disabled writers to do their best work, as discussed in this podcast conversation between Joanna Penn and SJ Pajonas.
- AI narration provides audio content at a fraction of the cost of human narration, making it financially feasible for authors earlier in their careers and creating far more content for visually impaired readers than would be possible with a reliance on human narrators alone.
- AI-generated book covers, audiobooks and translations can put indie publishing within financial reach of authors with a limited budget. This is not necessarily removing jobs for experts, as they wouldn’t be commissioning narrators / translators if they didn’t have AI
We encourage all authors to create their own AI policies for their own publishing businesses and to revisit and update them as the situation around AI evolves.
Click here for ALLi’s AI Internal Use Policy.
Ethical Author Program
As part of our ethical self-publishing campaign, the Alliance of Independent Authors runs an ethical author program. This program provides a code of conduct for authors to follow in relation to author ethics. The code is voluntary and is additional to the required Code of Standards signed up to by ALLi members. Any author, regardless of publication method or membership, can sign up to this code, once they agree to the guiding principles.
The ethical author code has for some years included a clause related to AI:
Use of Tools and AI
I declare use of AI and other tools where appropriate. I edit and curate the output of any generative text tool I use to ensure the text is not discriminatory, libelous, an infringement of copyright, or otherwise illegal or illicit. I recognise that it is my job to ensure I am legally compliant, not the AI tool or service I use.
ALLi’s Answers to Your AI Ethics Questions
Will AI make writers defunct?
No. Humans have agency and intelligence, which, despite its name, AI does not. We are driven to create and we want to connect with other humans. AI tools won’t change those fundamental drives but it will change how society values certain kinds of writing and writers, and how writers connect with readers, in ways that are as yet unforeseeable. Right now, AI tools are being used by creators to help bring their ideas to fruition, often cutting out the most tedious parts of the job or allowing for more creative solutions.
How might an author use AI in writing?
Writing is always a challenge and AI tools can help. “Some of us love to edit and revise but are loath to put that first word on paper, while others are the complete opposite,” says Amit Gupta, creator of Sudowrite.com. “Some get mired in the middle, others tear their hair out landing the ending. My belief is that just as spelling and grammar checking software lifted some of the load off our shoulders, software can do the same when we’re stuck in a scene, struggling to describe an object or a setting, or just not sure how to inject something fresh into a tired plot line.”
Won’t AI result in the production of many more books, leading to market saturation?
The market is already saturated. There are already far more books available than any reader can read (as well as movies, TV shows, games, and other forms of entertainment). Yes we still write books and readers still. In fact AI tools with increasingly sophisticated recommendation algorithms are actually aiding book discoverability.
Readers know how to find what they love to read and love to make choices that support human creators. As AI tools improve, authors have to double down on being human. How? By finding the value in what we offer and then doing that more: more often, more intentionally, more liberally.
The publishing future, like the publishing past, belongs to those who can engage readers and stand out with a unique and identifiable voice—not those pushing a punishing, cookie-cutter productivity model that cannot outpace the machines, or those trying to pass off machine-generated work as their own.
What are examples of using AI unethically as an author?
One example of using AI unethically as an author would be cutting and pasting generated text without checking and adapting the output, then passing off these words as your own. Another would be making use of output that is derogatory or offensive.
What should I do instead?
AI tools can be used for idea, character, and story generation as well as text generation. It is your job as an ethical author to edit and curate the words generated by a tool you've prompted.
If you use text generated by an AI tool, run the final work through a plagiarism checker to ensure you have not unwittingly infringed someone's copyright. ProWritingAid and Grammarly both have plagiarism checkers.
Should I declare my use of AI tools?
While authors are not legally required to declare the use of AI in their works, we encourage transparency regarding AI use. This recommendation aligns with ALLi's broader commitment to ethical publishing practices. Amazon KDP and other platforms ask authors to indicate whether any part of their book was generated by AI when they upload their manuscripts. This includes text and images and requires authors to disclose whether their content is AI-generated or AI-assisted.
AI-Generated: Content that has been entirely created by AI with little to no human intervention. For example, if an AI tool writes a chapter or generates images without significant editing or input from the author, this content would be considered AI-generated.
AI-Assisted: Content where AI has been used as a tool to aid the author but where the final output is significantly shaped by human intervention. For instance, an author might use AI to generate ideas, suggestions, or rough drafts, but then heavily revise, rewrite, or edit the content themselves. This would fall under AI-assisted.
The disclosure is intended to help Amazon manage the quality and originality of the content available on its platform, as well as to address potential legal issues related to copyright and intellectual property.
What effect does AI have on the Environment?
Many critics cite AI's potential to accelerate environmental degradation due to the need to cool data centers where the processing of the huge amounts of data required by AI tools takes place. According to one study conducted by researchers from Massachusetts, the process of training AI models to do NLP produces five times more carbon dioxide than the lifetime emissions of the average car.
Some AI and tech companies are taking steps to address this issue; for example, Satori, a new green supercomputer built by IBM, performs energy-efficient AI training. Google has committed to running its data centers on carbon-free energy 24/7 by 2030, and companies like Microsoft are pursuing ambitious goals to become carbon negative in the near future.
How can I make the most out of AI as a creative business owner?
You likely use a computer as well as, if not instead of, handwriting your drafts. You probably use email more than snail mail, a cell phone rather than a landline, video streaming rather than DVDs. Using affordable AI tools that aid your creative and business processes is similar.
Ask 3 core questions:
- Which of my writing and publishing challenges can be met by AI solutions?
- Which AI tools do I want to implement in my writing and publishing?
- Which AI tools do I not want to implement in my writing and publishing?
Stay curious. Investigate the tools rather than making assumptions.
How can I set my work apart from AI-generated work?
Two ALLi members, Kari Lineberry and Dana Chandler, came together as KD Resources to trademark a “Human Created Symbol of Distinction” that “signifies that the owner of the work attests that no Artificial Intelligence (AI) was used to write or create any portion of the work.”
There is one thing that AI, and indeed other authors, can never do: be you. Specialize in giving your writing your particular stamp. In your writing, communicate from your deepest experience, using your own voice, telling your own truths. In your publishing, focus on local, imperfect, real connections with other human beings: your readers and the authors in your niche whose work you most admire. Think about incorporating audio and video, where you cannot help but reveal yourself, into your marketing.
However you do it, be personal, be honest, be authentically you. Personality, values, personal branding: these become ever more key, as does true human connection with your readers.
The conversation about AI continues, and we’re happy to hear from our members any time.
Resources
The AI landscape is changing week-by-week, and sometimes day-by-day, and this is your source for the latest information ALLi has to share on this topic, as well as educational resources to spur your curiosity about this new tool. You’ll find more information at our Self-Publishing Advice Center, which now includes a distinct AI category.
Blog Posts & Podcasts
- Joanna Penn: List of AI writing tools (regularly updated). This is a list of growing AI tools that you can use to help you generate a variety of different types of writing from prose, inspiration and prompts for your own prose, poetry, marketing copy and more. See also: 9 Ways That Artificial Intelligence (AI) Will Disrupt Authors And The Publishing Industry and Joanna's interviews with authors using AI tools:
- Cowriting with Artificial Intelligence with Yudhanjaya Wijeratne
- The AI-Augmented Author. Writing With GPT-3 With Paul Bellow
- Orna Ross & Joanna Penn: AskALLi Advanced Salon: Artificial Intelligence and the Indie Author Orna Ross interviews Joanna Penn about recent AI developments
- Monica Dube: How Can Writers and Publishers Utilize Artificial Intelligence Blog post from PublishDrive
- Holly Payne: AI and Book Discovery: SelfPubCon (Self Publishing Advice Conference) session where Holly Payne introduces AI as a book discovery and author comparison tool.
Books
Chase, Calum. The Economic Singularity: Artificial intelligence and the Death of Capitalism – Argues that Universal Basic Income is only part of the solution to how we'll manage a world where AI and other tools do most of the work. We are probably going to need an entirely new economic system. You may not agree with everything in this book but you will certainly be given food for thought.
Davenport, Thomas and and Kirby, Julia. Only Humans Need Apply: Winners and Losers in the Age of Smart Machines – The authors reframe the conversation about automation, arguing that the future of increased productivity and business success isn't either human or machine. It's both. The key is augmentation, utilizing technology to help humans work better, smarter, and faster.
Google: The People + AI Guidebook – Tools methods and best practice guidelines for those developing AI products in a human-centered way. Originally launched in 2019, now updated with new insights, offering a set of methods, best practices, and examples for designing with AI.
Lee, Kai-Fu: AI Superpowers – Taiwan-born Kai-Fu Lee believes China will be the next tech-innovation superpower and in his new (and first) book, AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order, he explains why.
Penn, Joanna. Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, and Virtual Worlds: The Impact of Converging Technologies On Authors and the Publishing Industry – How authors and publishers can embrace the opportunities and engage in conversations around AI in ways that positively direct the reinvention of our industry. Clear, practical and eye-opening. The must-read book for authors and publishers.
Tegmark, Max. Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
A rich and visionary exploration of whether AI will eventually outsmart humans and replace us altogether or help life on earth flourish as never before.
I had a sad chuckle reading another AI is not that bad article, as authors and artists are not only being out gunned by AI hacks, but out right replaced. I doesn’t matter how Ethical I am as a writer and artist, the bad guys along with the public just don’t care. As a writer I am trying to protect my work with an old fashioned bicycle lock, while the internet hacks are using dynamite.
They are not wasting time disusing the ins and outs of AI. They are using every hack that is possible and adapting 10 times faster than the “good guys”.
I gave up years ago any idea of making a living as a writer. For me creating something, and seeing it in print is the joy in life. If by some odd chance I make a few bucks, that’s OK.
If anything I do does get noticed, a much smarter and quicker internet geek will figure out how to get that money before I do anyway.
Like all things “human” the best advice you can give the self published author/illustrator is the facts on just how bad AI is and how to deal with it. Give them the real stats on creative jobs lost, works copy or stolen, images gone, etc. Give them real tools to deal with the collapse of the intellectual market that is coming.
I’ve been using ProWritingAid to assist in grammar for several years and came across Joanna Penn’s video about Sudowrite by chance. After watching the video, then reading this article I was reminded of Betty Crocker and I’ll quote part of the PBS article I searched out for this response:
“Before Betty Crocker was synonymous with boxed cake mix and canned frosting, she was a ‘kitchen confidante,’ a maternal and guiding presence in kitchens across America. She was the ‘Dear Abby’ of cooking, a woman people could trust with their most frustrating kitchen woes. She had answers to the questions that plagued so many home cooks’ questions like, ‘Why won’t my cake rise?’ or ‘Do you have a great recipe for blueberry pie?’ or ‘How can I make my pancakes fluffy?’ Betty was there to answer all of these questions and more. She encouraged women to get in the kitchen and try something new. Home cooks could take comfort in the fact that when problems arose, Betty would be there to help them along the way.”
Betty Crocker could be considered the ancestor of modern AI writing systems even if “she” had a team of people writing in her name. Also, “she” was a brand name used. I would say that in context of the use of Betty Crocker that as long as the AI content is presented under another pen name (to separate it from the normal creative workflow of the human author) and then the other pen name is presented as a “brand” aka your own Betty Crocker where the AI content replaces the “Betty was there to answer all these questions and more” going on at the company where they created her character that it would meet the ethical part of the criteria.
I’d say that even the name generator inside the Scrivener software in some ways is AI. Also, using a fictional name as a pen name creates a Betty Crocker type of character for the author. That person might be a school teacher, write wholesome romance under her real name and erotica in this other pen name. Because she’s a school teacher she wouldn’t tell “I also write erotica as such and such.” So the situation of people creating pen names for marketing purposes, such as generating an external (passive/don’t do much advertising for this group of books) income to pay for the costs of their regular set of publications. (ahum, Joanna Penn kept her romance pen name private for a time as an example).
So my view would be to create AI-generated work, then rewrite it extensively, edit, run through plagiarism tool and if anything is flagged do more rewrites. Then publish under a “Betty Crocker-style” pen name and list this pen name as an asset owned by your publishing company and the content written as a “marketing publication” (for a lack of a better name). I’d assume that such works then are owned by the publishing company you might own and NOT by the author themselves.
Another way to look at this is to consider it something like an artificial ghostwriter.
In terms of using this technology. I had a look at Sudowrite because of Joanna’s video, and when I’d use it I’d treat the generated text like first draft. That is… something in need of my distinct voice, my style of writing, my feelings and the input of how I add the five senses into a story. I would likely rewrite the entirety of the text to how I want my stories to sound in the end. But in the end it would end up with Betty Crocker type of pen names and only be there to generate an income that I can use to market and advertise the real author behind the company.