skip to Main Content
News Summary: James Patterson Awards $50,000 Grants, AI Research Sparks Debate On Language Change

News Summary: James Patterson Awards $50,000 Grants, AI Research Sparks Debate on Language Change

Would $50,000 landing in your lap give you the breathing space in terms of time and life admin to clear your head and your diary and finally finish the book you’ve been thinking about for years? James Patterson certainly thinks, or at least hopes, so. Last week he announced that he had chosen 12 authors each to be recipients of a “Go Finish Your Book!” grant of that amount. If there is a repeat offer at some point in the future, I will of course update you.

ALLi News Editor Dan Holloway

Patterson’s Big Bet on Writers

Patterson also discussed the initiative in a video interview and it has sparked reactions across the publishing world, including commentary from Literary Hub. His goal is straightforward: to give writers the freedom to set aside the financial and time pressures that often prevent them from finishing their books.

Is AI Changing How We Talk?

I came across a very interesting and forthright op-ed last week from Mark Williams. It was a response to research from Florida State University that has just been published, suggesting (as per the prevailing internet opinion) that the use of AI is narrowing the use of language and creating homogenized vocabulary and expression patterns—he disagrees, natch. This sent me to the research to see what it actually says.

It starts by giving the context for asking the question of what influence AI has had on language: more than half of under-30s and nearly half of 30-to-39-year-olds use generative AI. The research scoured 22.1 million words that had not been generated by AI and looked at whether certain words had proliferated in use over time. And they found that a wide range of what they call “AI buzzwords” had indeed shown a marked increase in usage. As a control, they noted that synonyms not picked up in AI suggestions did not show such an increase (contrasting the buzzword “underscore” with the non-buzzy “accentuate”).

What this means, they say, is that AI use is seeping into everyday language. Fast Company and FSU News have both covered the findings, while Williams responded in The New Publishing Standard.

As many of you know, my day job is in the Linguistics Faculty at the University of Oxford. And my main observation would be that this is interesting, unsurprising, and hardly novel. If someone suggested that this was anything other than “how language works” to my face, I’d probably just say, “Lol.”


Thoughts or further questions on this post or any self-publishing issue?

Question mark in light bulbsIf you’re an ALLi member, head over to the SelfPubConnect forum for support from our experienced community of indie authors, advisors, and our own ALLi team. Simply create an account (if you haven’t already) to request to join the forum and get going.

Non-members looking for more information can search our extensive archive of blog posts and podcast episodes packed with tips and advice at ALLi's Self-Publishing Advice Center.

Author: Dan Holloway

Dan Holloway is a novelist, poet and spoken word artist. He is the MC of the performance arts show The New Libertines, which has appeared at festivals and fringes from Manchester to Stoke Newington. In 2010 he was the winner of the 100th episode of the international spoken prose event Literary Death Match, and earlier this year he competed at the National Poetry Slam final at the Royal Albert Hall. His latest collection, The Transparency of Sutures, is available for Kindle at http://www.amazon.co.uk/Transparency-Sutures-Dan-Holloway-ebook/dp/B01A6YAA40

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest advice, news, ratings, tools and trends.

Back To Top
×Close search
Search
Loading...