skip to Main Content
News Summary: Frankfurt Survey Reveals AI Use Across Publishing; EU Act Draws Criticism

News Summary: Frankfurt Survey Reveals AI Use Across Publishing; EU Act Draws Criticism

As foreshadowed on Tuesday, I end the week with a round-up that includes news from Frankfurt, where last week’s other major conference took place. One of the things that particularly caught my eye there was the release of a survey by BISG (Book Industry Study Group) on the use of AI in the publishing industry.

ALLi News Editor Dan Holloway

It struck me as interesting because we see so many surveys about our use of AI as writers—but very few that examine how it’s being used in the wider community that serves creators.

How Publishing Uses AI

Here are the noteworthy findings. Forty-six percent of respondents in a survey of 559 participants—about half from publishing houses, with the rest from libraries and other industry-adjacent organizations—said they use AI in their work. That’s roughly in line with surveys of writers.

And like writers, most of that use is in back-office tasks such as data analysis, metadata, administration, and marketing. It’s fascinating to see that industry professionals share many of the same concerns we do, with anxiety ranging from copyright infringement to a market saturated with low-quality content.

What makes this particularly relevant is that, as indies, we’re not just writers—we also do what publishers do (even if we outsource some of it, as many of them do). It’s easy, when thinking about our own use of AI, to look only at writers’ surveys and assume those comparisons are most relevant. But we’re part of this broader publishing ecosystem, too.

EU AI Act Raises Concerns

On the subject of AI and Frankfurt, Publishing PerspectivesPorter Anderson published an illuminating interview with one of the major speakers at the fair, Jessica Sänger of the German Publishers and Booksellers Association.

She spoke candidly about the European Union’s AI Act, which came into force earlier this year. Initially celebrated as a landmark move by creative industries to hold tech companies accountable, the Act has since sparked significant concern over how it’s being implemented—prompting yet another addition to that industry-favorite genre: the open letter.

In particular, the Code of Practice meant to regulate what tech companies can do and to help rights holders enforce their rights is seen as weak. Sänger also points out that it allows companies signing on to the agreement a one-year grace period without scrutiny.


Thoughts or further questions on this post or any self-publishing issue?

Question mark in light bulbsIf you’re an ALLi member, head over to the SelfPubConnect forum for support from our experienced community of indie authors, advisors, and our own ALLi team. Simply create an account (if you haven’t already) to request to join the forum and get going.

Non-members looking for more information can search our extensive archive of blog posts and podcast episodes packed with tips and advice at ALLi's Self-Publishing Advice Center.

Author: Dan Holloway

Dan Holloway is a novelist, poet and spoken word artist. He is the MC of the performance arts show The New Libertines, which has appeared at festivals and fringes from Manchester to Stoke Newington. In 2010 he was the winner of the 100th episode of the international spoken prose event Literary Death Match, and earlier this year he competed at the National Poetry Slam final at the Royal Albert Hall. His latest collection, The Transparency of Sutures, is available for Kindle at http://www.amazon.co.uk/Transparency-Sutures-Dan-Holloway-ebook/dp/B01A6YAA40

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest advice, news, ratings, tools and trends.

Back To Top
×Close search
Search
Loading...