skip to Main Content
News Summary: U.S. Senate Hearing Tackles AI’s Use Of Copyrighted Works

News Summary: U.S. Senate Hearing Tackles AI’s Use of Copyrighted Works

I have reported on what seems like a weekly basis on legal cases around AI and copyright, but this week I want to report on a hearing held in the legislative branch of the U.S. government. Before doing so, being an ignorant Brit, I undertook some brief research on what exactly the status of Senate hearings is—so if nothing else, this has increased my knowledge of how government works across the world (note for U.K. readers: I think it’s a bit like a Select Committee).

ALLi News Editor Dan Holloway

The hearing’s title was “Too Big to Prosecute? Examining the AI Industry’s Mass Ingestion of Copyrighted Works for AI Training,” which in itself made what may be seen as a surprisingly provocative statement.

Familiar Players and Perspectives

There was a familiar cast of characters. Maria Pallante is the CEO of the Association of American Publishers (AAP). And author representation was provided by bestseller David Baldacci, who showed that he was part of the traditional, not the indie, world by suggesting that we are reaching a point where the number of books that can be published on a day will be limited—something that happened on Kindle more than a year ago as part of Amazon’s pushback on AI content.

Nothing particularly new emerged. The argument in favor of more freedom for tech companies focuses on keeping up with China and using the fair use parts of existing copyright law as the tool for providing that freedom. Against this, the argument was put that mass piracy through sites like LibGen could never be fair use.

The National Interest Reframed

It was interesting, though, to hear Senator Josh Hawley, who convened the hearing, flipping the national interest argument, pointing out that authors like Baldacci are U.S. citizens and illicitly using their work is hardly patriotic. That’s closer to the European emphasis on the importance of the creative industries for national economies.

But having the same arguments heard together in a new context—one closer to the lawmaking process rather than the law-interpreting one—might serve a useful purpose as a new landscape forms in the months and years to come.Top of Form


Thoughts or further questions on this post or any self-publishing issue?

Question mark in light bulbsIf you’re an ALLi member, head over to the SelfPubConnect forum for support from our experienced community of indie authors, advisors, and our own ALLi team. Simply create an account (if you haven’t already) to request to join the forum and get going.

Non-members looking for more information can search our extensive archive of blog posts and podcast episodes packed with tips and advice at ALLi's Self-Publishing Advice Center.

Author: Dan Holloway

Dan Holloway is a novelist, poet and spoken word artist. He is the MC of the performance arts show The New Libertines, which has appeared at festivals and fringes from Manchester to Stoke Newington. In 2010 he was the winner of the 100th episode of the international spoken prose event Literary Death Match, and earlier this year he competed at the National Poetry Slam final at the Royal Albert Hall. His latest collection, The Transparency of Sutures, is available for Kindle at http://www.amazon.co.uk/Transparency-Sutures-Dan-Holloway-ebook/dp/B01A6YAA40

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest advice, news, ratings, tools and trends.

Back To Top
×Close search
Search
Loading...